Clinical Applicability

We do a lot of really cool and scientifically interesting stuff in both our lab and the field as a whole. We have now developed our technology to the point where we can take an MRI scan of a heart and develop a complete model, with accurate fiber directions from diffusion tensor data, in a matter of days if not hours. However, it’s easy to get caught up in the technology and the science and lose sight of clinical endpoints.

This past week, we had the good fortune to be visited by a research scientist from a device company. He pointed out that despite the great sophistication of our knowledge about various CEP minutiae, there remain basic problems with pacing and defibrillation therapies, and with our knowledge of cardiovascular disease in general.

And that brings up a very important point. At times, I’ve felt like we’re patching the symptoms instead of fixing the problem — by researching heart attacks that result primarily from cardiovascular disease, we’re redirecting effort that could be spent on eliminating cardiovascular disease in the first place. For example, it seems vegetarians may have around a 20% smaller risk of death from ischemic heart disease than non-vegetarians. Occasional meat eaters fall between meat-eaters and vegetarians. (Please note that I don’t think that one study is conclusive — I haven’t done a thorough literature search.) To keep things honest, this study suggests that in British vegetarians, differences in mortality may be due to other lifestyle factors.

Here are some other articles on the subject, with their conclusions:

After reading over these abstracts, my suspicions and some things I have heard have been confirmed: It’s really hard to get conclusive evidence out of human studies.

Even if everyone on the planet simultaneously switched to the optimum diet for minimizing heart disease, whatever that is, there would still be a need for treatment of ischemic heart disease in the form of defibrillator devices for the next several decades, as in many people the damage is already done. With that in mind, it is important that we as a research community focus our work on developing helpful therapies rather than keeping to our ivory towers.

Pacemakers Hacked

Nearly one year ago, I raised some questions about the safeguards present on ICDs and pacemakers, especially given the expansion of longer-range (“wandless”) telemetry.

Now a group of researchers has gotten access to a device without the normal accompanying computer hardware, normally called a “programmer”. They do note that it required expensive equipment at a short range, but feasibility has now been shown. The FDA has been notified (by them, not me).

Garfield minus Garfield

Rob today showed me a new and different web comic: garfield minus garfield.

I could try to explain it, but the author does a much better job, so here’s vis spiel:

Who would have guessed that when you remove Garfield from the Garfield comic strips, the result is an even better comic about schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and the empty desperation of modern life? Friends, meet Jon Arbuckle. Let’s laugh and learn with him on a journey deep into the tortured mind of an isolated young everyman as he fights a losing battle against loneliness in a quiet American suburb.

Here’s a sample:
GMG Sample

It’s updated frequently and offers an RSS feed. What are you waiting for?

Goodbye, Zipcar

I don’t have a car in Baltimore. As such, I was happy when a company called FlexCar made some cars available at Hopkins. I could take a car for a few hours at a time, for $6 per hour, and with about a $30 sign-up fee. Their customer service was always very friendly and helpful, and I had no trouble speaking with a real person.

Unfortunately, they “merged” with their main competitor, Zipcar. Effectively, they were taken over. FlexCars are becoming Zipcars. The rates are higher ($9 per hour). There’s an annual fee of about $50.

I used some free credit I got for switching my account over to Zipcar this weekend. When I got in the car, the key was in the glove box (as it had been with FlexCars). I took it out of the glove box, did my driving, and put it back where I found it. Later I got a voicemail saying that the person after me couldn’t find the key. However, to return the call, I had to go through their main 866 number system. Their phone menu is horrible. The menu options are ambiguous and unhelpful. Pressing zero repeatedly got me nowhere. To get anywhere, you have to enter your Zipcard number — and I don’t keep the card on my person. When I expressed my displeasure at this to the rep (that I finally got to), he said there was no way around the phone system, even if I was trying to return their call!

Now, granted, they did send me an email survey after the call, and I let them know about these issues, but my first experience with Zipcar left me annoyed at best.

The funny thing is, technically it’s the exact same thing as FlexCar. The same cars (here) even that I had used under FlexCar. It’s amazing what a difference it makes who is running the show on the back-end though. I recommended FlexCar to people frequently. I will not recommend Zipcar to anyone.

Mediocrity has won out yet again.